GH Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Quest Diagnostics has a net margin of -56.28% compared to Guardant Health's net margin of 9.08%. Guardant Health's return on equity of -651% beat Quest Diagnostics's return on equity of 12.68%.

Guardant Health has a consensus price target of $44.11, signalling downside risk potential of -2.27%. On the other hand Quest Diagnostics has an analysts' consensus of $170.59 which suggests that it could grow by 11.75%. Given that Quest Diagnostics has higher upside potential than Guardant Health, analysts believe Quest Diagnostics is more attractive than Guardant Health.

Guardant Health has a beta of 1.280, which suggesting that the stock is 27.95% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Quest Diagnostics has a beta of 0.907, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.31%.

Guardant Health has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Quest Diagnostics offers a yield of 1.97% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.75 per share. Guardant Health pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Quest Diagnostics pays out 36.77% of its earnings as a dividend. Quest Diagnostics's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Guardant Health quarterly revenues are $191.5M, which are smaller than Quest Diagnostics quarterly revenues of $2.5B. Guardant Health's net income of -$107.8M is lower than Quest Diagnostics's net income of $226M. Notably, Guardant Health's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Quest Diagnostics's PE ratio is 20.52x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Guardant Health is 7.92x versus 1.80x for Quest Diagnostics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Exact Sciences has a net margin of -56.28% compared to Guardant Health's net margin of -5.4%. Guardant Health's return on equity of -651% beat Exact Sciences's return on equity of -6.77%.

Guardant Health has a consensus price target of $44.11, signalling downside risk potential of -2.27%. On the other hand Exact Sciences has an analysts' consensus of $72.29 which suggests that it could grow by 33.22%. Given that Exact Sciences has higher upside potential than Guardant Health, analysts believe Exact Sciences is more attractive than Guardant Health.

Guardant Health has a beta of 1.280, which suggesting that the stock is 27.95% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Exact Sciences has a beta of 1.238, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.76%.

Guardant Health has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Exact Sciences offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Guardant Health pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Exact Sciences pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Guardant Health quarterly revenues are $191.5M, which are smaller than Exact Sciences quarterly revenues of $708.7M. Guardant Health's net income of -$107.8M is lower than Exact Sciences's net income of -$38.2M. Notably, Guardant Health's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Exact Sciences's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Guardant Health is 7.92x versus 3.69x for Exact Sciences. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Natera has a net margin of -56.28% compared to Guardant Health's net margin of -7.18%. Guardant Health's return on equity of -651% beat Natera's return on equity of -26.45%.

Guardant Health has a consensus price target of $44.11, signalling downside risk potential of -2.27%. On the other hand Natera has an analysts' consensus of $176.87 which suggests that it could grow by 5.62%. Given that Natera has higher upside potential than Guardant Health, analysts believe Natera is more attractive than Guardant Health.

Guardant Health has a beta of 1.280, which suggesting that the stock is 27.95% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Natera has a beta of 1.651, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 65.075%.

Guardant Health has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Natera offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Guardant Health pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Natera pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Guardant Health quarterly revenues are $191.5M, which are smaller than Natera quarterly revenues of $439.8M. Guardant Health's net income of -$107.8M is lower than Natera's net income of -$31.6M. Notably, Guardant Health's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Natera's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Guardant Health is 7.92x versus 13.30x for Natera. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Progyny has a net margin of -56.28% compared to Guardant Health's net margin of 3.64%. Guardant Health's return on equity of -651% beat Progyny's return on equity of 11.31%.

Guardant Health has a consensus price target of $44.11, signalling downside risk potential of -2.27%. On the other hand Progyny has an analysts' consensus of $19.29 which suggests that it could fall by -10.22%. Given that Progyny has more downside risk than Guardant Health, analysts believe Guardant Health is more attractive than Progyny.

Guardant Health has a beta of 1.280, which suggesting that the stock is 27.95% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Progyny has a beta of 1.314, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.352%.

Guardant Health has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Progyny offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Guardant Health pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Progyny pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Guardant Health quarterly revenues are $191.5M, which are smaller than Progyny quarterly revenues of $286.6M. Guardant Health's net income of -$107.8M is lower than Progyny's net income of $10.4M. Notably, Guardant Health's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Progyny's PE ratio is 37.03x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Guardant Health is 7.92x versus 1.86x for Progyny. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.